Putin is seeking to weaponise threat of mass migration, says Estonian PM
Vladimir Putin is seeking to weaponise the threat of mass migration to divide and weaken Europe as supporters of Ukraine struggle to maintain unity to defeat Russia, Kaja Kallas, the Estonian prime minister said on Friday.
“What our adversaries know is migration is our vulnerability,” she said. “The aim is to make life really impossible in Ukraine so that there would be migration pressure to Europe, and this is what they are doing.”
She said Russia had already created the migration pressure through disruption in Syria and in Africa via the Wagner group.
“I think we have to understand that Russia is weaponising migration. Our adversaries are weaponising migration.
“They push the migrants over the border, and they create problems for the Europeans because they weaponise this since with human rights, you have to accept those people. And that is, of course, water to the mill of the far right.”
Kallas was speaking at a briefing in Tallinn in which she admitted the plight of the Ukrainians on the front was “very serious” and European promises of extra weapons had not been delivered, something that could be rectified by Nato taking charge of the coordination of weapon delivery. “The problem is that our promises do not save lives”, she said.
Kallas is one of many European politicians trying to spell out the many negative consequences to Europe of a Ukrainian defeat, and rebut those that claim such a reverse can be somehow contained.
She was speaking in Tallinn the day after the former Estonian president Toomas Ilves predicted that if Ukraine fell into Russian hands as many as 30 million Ukrainians would seek to flee. “That is the threat we face due to our inaction,” he said, pointing out that Europe had a “complete meltdown” when faced with two million refugees from the Middle East in 2015.
A pamphlet produced by pro-Ukrainian NGOs have detailed how Russian shelling between October 2022 and January 2023 led to an increase in migration out of Ukraine a quarter higher than the previous year.
The recent round of attacks have targeted electricity generation rather than transmission. Olena Halushka, Board head at the international centre for a Ukrainian Victory said: “Right now they are trying to bomb Ukraine into the stone age,” adding that in the past two months more damage has been inflicted than the whole of the winter of 2023. She said: “Europe needs to think about Kharkiv, a city the size of Munich, without energy this winter and then think about the financial implications of tens of millions of Ukrainians fleeing the war due to fear of occupation”.
Kallas said Russian assaults are now targeting Ukrainian cities every day and every night.
She conceded that, based on geography and history, some countries in Europe did not see the threat of a Ukrainian defeat in the same way. “They don’t see and they don’t believe that if Ukraine falls Europe is in danger, the whole of Europe, maybe some countries, but not the whole of Europe”.
She said she feared a mistake was being made similar to the late 1930s, when linked conflicts were being seen as isolated events. Tipped as a possible successor to Josep Borrell as EU high commissioner for foreign policy, Kallas cited links between the conflicts in Azerbaijan and Armenia, the Middle East, and the South China Sea. She said the same error was made in the 1930s about the Italian invasion of Ethiopia, the German occupation of Austria and the Sino-Japanese war.
“The lesson from 1938 and 1939 is that if aggression pays off somewhere, it will be taken up elsewhere. Ukraine’s defeat is something all aggressors will learn from. They will learn that in 2024, bluntly, you can just colonise another country and nothing happens to you.”
She pointed to what she described as baby steps to strengthening the European defence architecture, including a European defence fund, the increase in individual nation state defence spending and the proposal for a shared defence debt bond to boost spending. She denied Estonia had had any serious discussions about sending troops to Ukraine, while arguing at the same time it is better if Putin kept guessing about Europe’s plans.
She said it was also a valid criticism that Ukraine was not moving fast enough to mobilise more troops.