China stocks slide, US stocks glide – will reform work to stem the tide?

Riding the new wave of demand for artificial intelligence, cloud computing and upbeat expectations for the US economy, the seven stocks accounted for 45 per cent of the S&P 500’s SPX return in January, and a more striking 71 per cent when Tesla is excluded and shares are slashed, said Michael Hartnett, Bank of America’s chief market strategist, in a note last week.

In contrast, China’s stock market has been in free fall, with a loss of US$3 trillion in capitalisation over the past three years. Highly restrictive pandemic controls, regulatory tightening for property and big tech companies and a bumpy post-Covid recovery have dented confidence across the board.
It may be difficult to rely on robust economic growth … to drive a recovery in the stock market
Ambound report

Beijing has ramped up efforts to prevent a downturn in recent weeks after mainland stocks fell to a five-year low. But analysts said the measures could only lead to a temporary rebound, and a sustained rally must be backed by improving economic fundamentals.

The plunge in China’s stock market shows a systematic collapse of investor confidence, and the drastic fluctuations are different from those driven by small issues or unexpected events in the past, according to a report published by Ambound, an independent think tank.

“This time, the lack of confidence in the stock market is compounded by issues outside the capital market, broader economic and societal concerns,” Ambound said last week. “With China’s economy facing challenges, it may be difficult to rely on robust economic growth as in the past to drive a recovery in the stock market.”

China’s economy grew by 5.2 per cent year on year in 2023, beating the government’s official target, but Beijing has an uphill battle to achieve solid and sustained growth thanks to a property market crisis, employment worries and erratic business sentiment – all while it works to put the economy on a greener and more tech-driven path.

A heightened focus on national security and subsequent investigations of foreign companies have also sent chills up the spines of overseas investors. They have long voiced concerns that unpredictable policies have tarnished the allure of the Chinese market to outsiders.

President Xi Jinping has stressed the need for China to become a financial superpower, with a system distinct from Western models. Policy statements have emphasised a strong foundation and more substantial support for the real economy.

China economy: manufacturing, consumption to drive 2024 gains, Fidelity says

Beijing has been on high alert against weaknesses in its financial system, particularly as the all-front rivalry with the US intensifies and Washington expands its ambitions to limit China’s access to cutting-edge tech.

“China would do well to learn from the openness and transparency of US equity markets, including a high standard of corporate disclosures, climate concerns, and the presence of aspirational activist investors,” said Swarup Gupta, industry manager at the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).

Financial development is critically important, said Zheng Yongnian, an adviser to Beijing’s policymakers.

The market – rather than window guidance – should be allowed to play a more prominent role
Tianchen Xu, Economist Intelligence Unit

“Finance should support technological transformation in enterprises, as evidenced by venture capital in the United States,” said Zheng, also president of the Institute for International Affairs Qianhai, a think tank based in Shenzhen.

“We cannot separate finance from the real economy. As excessive financialization, seen in the United States, has led to many negative effects, we must prevent similar situations from arising,” he said.

There’s no country that attaches more importance to letting the financial sector serve the real economy than China, said Tianchen Xu, senior China economist at the EIU, but its goal of building itself into a global financial powerhouse is being hindered by tight capital controls.

“Credit growth has outpaced nominal GDP growth for a long time, but the economy struggles to improve, suggesting there’s some resource misallocation. Therefore, the market – rather than window guidance – should be allowed to play a more prominent role.

“Keeping the door half closed makes it easy to manage capital flows, but as a result institutions and investors have little chance to participate in the global financial arena. That is why China already boasts many globally competitive enterprises in manufacturing and technology, but its financial sector struggles to gain worldwide recognition.”