China’s ‘protectionism’ problem at local levels must be quelled, government adviser warns Beijing

China is looking to invigorate its sputtering economy that has struggled to show a strong recovery in a post-pandemic climate, and growth has been further dragged by Washington’s trade curbs and calls to de-risk from China in the supply chain.

China’s three-legged race to fend off the 4 D’s of an economic apocalypse

Zheng advised China to cultivate new growth momentum, such as through a greater willingness to “be more open and promise higher-quality conditions” when negotiating with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) in upgrading an established trade deal.

“Our supply and industrial chain has been extended … we should aim to build a common market with Asean in the future,” Zheng said.

Domestically, while Beijing has been scrambling to roll out economic stimulus and boost investor confidence through measures that aim to unleash consumption potential or relax property restrictions, Zheng raised concerns about the implementation of these policies.

“The central government came up with as many policies as possible to support private enterprises, but when they are being carried out at the local level, there are a lot of shady implementations, and some local practices even go against these policies,” Zheng said.

Beijing has vowed to boost its economy through a 31-point plan launched last year that aims to shore up the ailing private sector that underpins economic growth, jobs and technological innovation through increasing private investment spending and passing laws that would help stabilise the business environment.

“Bureaucracy and formalism still prevail, and some government departments are unwilling or do not dare to be responsible, making it hard for policies to yield results,” he added.

On Sunday, Shanghai’s transport authorities reversed a policy that banned ride-hailing services at its Pudong International Airport after the initial announcement caused widespread criticism from the public, with accusations that the policy conflicted with the central government’s vow to foster a stable and marketised economy.

Li Qiang vows ‘practical’ cooperation with Asean in bid to reassure neighbours

Zheng said examples of unhealthy competition among local governments, at a time when they are desperate to fuel growth, include attempts to deter businesses from moving to other provinces and making under-the-table deals to meet investment targets.

“There has been a return of local protectionism, and if this trend does not reverse, it would block the development of a unified domestic market,” Zheng warned, referring to Beijing’s development outlook to build more efficient and smoother flows of domestic production factors, including labour, goods, capital and data.

Despite growing by 5.2 per cent last year – after Beijing had set a target of “ around 5 per cent” – China’s economy has been seen to be losing steam, with an ailing property sector and declining private-sector investments in its post-pandemic recovery, against the backdrop of persistent tensions with the US.
This has seriously affected the global impression of China and China’s business environment
Zheng Yongnian

Zheng said China’s economy has also been challenged by American policies that he said have utilised a “cognitive warfare” approach by sending warnings concerning economic struggles while branding China an “uninvestable” place.

“This has seriously affected the global impression of China and China’s business environment,” Zheng said, adding that there has been a spillover effect on the strong US dollar, which he said has been beneficial to the US in terms of attracting talent and resources.

Zheng urged the Chinese government to consider opening up areas that would fulfil conditions in joining multilateral trade deals, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership ( CPTPP), which China has been pushing to join.

“We should expand such unilateral openness to more areas,” he said. “This is not to do so without having bottom lines, but to identify what is beneficial to us and open up according to our needs.”