US court allows Trump’s ban on DEI programmes pending appeal
But two of the three judges on the 4th Circuit panel wrote separately they did not agree with the substance of Trump’s orders and that agencies that implement them may risk violating the US Constitution.
“Despite the vitriol now being heaped on DEI, people of good faith who work to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion deserve praise, not opprobrium,” Circuit Judge Albert Diaz wrote.
Circuit Judge Allison Rushing, a Trump appointee, responded that her colleagues’ policy views were irrelevant to whether Trump’s directives should stand.
“A judge’s opinion that DEI programmes ‘deserve praise, not opprobrium’ should play absolutely no part in deciding this case,” Rushing wrote.
The decision, in a lawsuit by the city of Baltimore and three groups, will remain in place pending the outcome of the Trump administration’s appeal, which could take months.